How data-informed insights help you support your child's exam preparation more effectively
Free tier vs Analytics explained
With the free tier, you see what your child practiced:
With analytics, you see how your child practiced:
The difference? Context that helps you have more effective conversations about practice strategy.
See how analytics provides actionable insights in common situations
You see Emma answered 30 questions with 60% accuracy. You encourage her to keep practicing and maybe slow down.
Analytics shows a 35% rush factor—Emma is guessing on many questions. You have a specific conversation about taking time to think through problems, leading to better accuracy.
Oliver says he's tired. You're not sure if it's practice fatigue or just the time of day. You might reduce session length.
Analytics shows a 60% fatigue drop-off—Oliver's accuracy falls from 90% to 30% after question 15. You adjust to shorter, more frequent sessions with breaks.
You see Sophie has answered 500 questions total with 78% accuracy. You feel she's making progress but aren't sure about exam readiness.
Analytics shows an 85% readiness score with strong coverage across most topics, but identifies 2 weak areas in verbal reasoning. You focus practice on those specific topics.
✗Not a guarantee of exam success. Analytics provides insights, but results depend on many factors including effort, consistency, and starting level.
✗Not a replacement for practice. No amount of data changes the fact that improvement requires consistent practice.
✗Not a tutor substitute. Analytics shows patterns; it doesn't teach concepts or provide 1-on-1 instruction.
✗Not essential for all families. Many children succeed with just practice access and parental observation.